2004 Annual Scientific Meeting - CLICK FOR PROGRAMME A
NEW EFFECT-SITE CONTROLLED PATIENT MAINTAINED SEDATION SYSTEM IN DENTAL PATIENTS Chapman
R1, Green J1, Leitch J2, Kenny GNC1. 1University
Department of Anaesthesia, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, 2Glasgow Dental
Hospital. Introduction Patient
maintained sedation (PMS) involves the patient controlling their own level of
sedation by operating a patient control handset (1). Previous studies with
effect-site controlled Propofol patient maintained sedation (ePMS) demonstrated
that patients could become oversedated if they were allowed unlimited access to
the drug.The aim of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of a new
ePMS system in patients presenting for oral surgery. Methods Following
local ethics approval forty patients were recruited. Sedation was commenced at effect-site concentration (Ce) of 1μg.ml-1.Once
the handset was enabled the patients were instructed to press the button until
they felt ready to receive the dental local anaesthetic. When this was achieved
the handset was taken from the patient, and the target Ce held at that level for
the rest of the procedure. Results 39
patients completed their treatment satisfactorily and maintained an adequate
level of sedation (one patient had to be abandoned due to an unwillingness to
proceed, this was a failure of sedation not a specific failure of the ePMS
system).The mean final effect-site concentration was 1.48 (SD 0.4/Range 1.0-2.5)
μg.ml-1. There were no cases of haemodynamic instability and the
mean lowest oxygen saturation was 96% (SD=2.36). No
patients required emergency intervention in the form of supplementary oxygen or
airway maneuvers. Patient
& surgeon scores are shown in table 1. Discussion The
system was used successfully and treatment was completed in
39 patients. The system was found to be safe. Both surgeon and patient
satisfaction were high. Although this study demonstrates the efficacy of
effect-site controlled PMS, further work is required to confirm the safety of
ePMS. Anaesthetic supervision is necessary until then. Table
1. Patient and surgeon scores.
References
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|