The UK Society for Intravenous Anaesthesia
Based in the UK - as a resource for Anaesthesia Worldwide

2004 Annual Scientific Meeting - CLICK FOR PROGRAMME

    Effect-site controlled patient maintained propofol sedation (ePMS): a volunteer safety study

    Green J, Anderson K, Leitch J, Kenny GNC

    Glasgow Hospitals; Western/Gartnavel, Dental and GRI

    Introduction

    We have developed an ePMS machine that delivers propofol to achieve a target effect-site concentration (Ce) - regulated by a patient controlled handset. The object of this study was to assess the safety of the system in volunteers deliberately attempting to over-sedate themselves.

    Methods

    20 healthy volunteers (ASA 1&2) were recruited and sedation was commenced with a set target Ce of 1.0 μg.ml-1. The system infuses propofol to a plasma concentration (Cp) of upto 200% of the set Ce target. Cp is then reduced to meet the rising Ce at the set target level. The patient handset became active when Cp had fallen to within 10% of the target Ce. Once active, a successful double press of the button (within one second) increased the target Ce by 0.2mcg/ml.. After 6 minutes without a successful press of the handset the system automatically reduced Ce by 0.2 μg.ml-1 (“machine step-down”). End points were defined as loss of verbal contact (abbreviated objective observers’ assessment of alertness sedation scale sedation scale 2), machine step-down, SpO2<90%, requirement for airway support measures or apnoea. At this point the subject was then asked to obey commands (open their eyes or stick their tongue). It was noted whether they could still successfully press the button.   

    Results (mean (SD) unless otherwise stated)

    All 20 volunteers successfully used the system to sedate themselves. All completed the study by 25 (5) minutes with an average maximum Ce of 2.7 (0.6) mg.ml-1. Reasons for ending the study are shown in the table.

     

    End-point of Study

    Machine Step-down

    Loss of verbal contact

    SpO2 <90%

    N

    15

    1

    4

    Ce at end point(mg.ml-1)

    2.6 (0.6)

    3.3

    2.8 (0.7)

    OAASS median (range)

    3 (3-4)

    2

    2.5 (2-3)

    Intervention rate (%)

    0

    0

    50

    Successful button press? n (%)

    7 (47)

    0

    1 (25)

    Obeyed command?  n (%)

    15 (100)

    0

    3 (75)

    Of the volunteers who desaturated: two took a deep inspiration when instructed to, and the saturation immediately recovered; and the remaining two required supplementary oxygen.

    Conclusion

    The ePMS system is not safe in its current form when volunteers deliberately attempt to over sedate.

    Discussion

    Half the volunteers who ended with machine step-down could still press the button successfully, suggesting they lost interest or forgot to press the button rather than could not manage the required coordination. One who desaturated could still press the button.

    The potential reasons why volunteers can deliberately over-sedate themselves could be that the ke0 of propofol used in this model   differs to that in our volunteers; or that the algorithm currently allows the volunteer to demand more propofol when Cp falls to within 10% of Ce - the actual allowable difference in Ce and Cp is greater at higher levels. Either of these could increase the unpredictability of the sedation.

 

Page last revised: August 07, 2008.

Website by RPD Publications (Europe); please e-mail suggestions or comments to DEE @ RPD-Publications .eu (omitting the three spaces)

All pages ©2008 - The UK Society for Intravenous Anaesthesia. Conditions for use.