2004 Annual Scientific Meeting - CLICK FOR PROGRAMME Effect-site
controlled patient maintained propofol sedation (ePMS): a volunteer
safety study Green
J, Anderson K, Leitch J, Kenny GNC Glasgow
Hospitals; Western/Gartnavel, Dental and GRI IntroductionWe
have developed an ePMS machine that delivers propofol to achieve a
target effect-site concentration (Ce) - regulated by a patient
controlled handset. The object of this study was to assess the safety of
the system in volunteers deliberately attempting to over-sedate
themselves. Methods20
healthy volunteers (ASA 1&2) were recruited and sedation was
commenced with a set target Ce of 1.0 μg.ml-1. The
system infuses propofol to a plasma concentration (Cp) of upto 200% of
the set Ce target. Cp is then reduced to meet the rising Ce at the set
target level. The patient handset became active when Cp had fallen to
within 10% of the target Ce. Once active, a successful double press of
the button (within one second) increased the target Ce by 0.2mcg/ml..
After 6 minutes without a successful press of the handset the system
automatically reduced Ce by 0.2 μg.ml-1 (“machine
step-down”). End points were defined as loss of verbal contact
(abbreviated objective observers’ assessment of alertness sedation
scale sedation scale 2), machine step-down, SpO2<90%, requirement for
airway support measures or apnoea. At this point the subject was then
asked to obey commands (open their eyes or stick their tongue). It was
noted whether they could still successfully press the button.
Results
(mean (SD) unless otherwise stated) All
20 volunteers successfully used the system to sedate themselves. All
completed the study by 25 (5) minutes with an average maximum Ce of 2.7
(0.6) mg.ml-1.
Reasons for ending the study are shown in the table.
Of
the volunteers who desaturated: two took a deep inspiration when
instructed to, and the saturation immediately recovered; and the
remaining two required supplementary oxygen. Conclusion The
ePMS system is not safe in its current form when volunteers deliberately
attempt to over sedate. Discussion Half
the volunteers who ended with machine step-down could still press the
button successfully, suggesting they lost interest or forgot to press
the button rather than could not manage the required coordination. One
who desaturated could still press the button. The potential reasons why volunteers can deliberately over-sedate themselves could be that the ke0 of propofol used in this model differs to that in our volunteers; or that the algorithm currently allows the volunteer to demand more propofol when Cp falls to within 10% of Ce - the actual allowable difference in Ce and Cp is greater at higher levels. Either of these could increase the unpredictability of the sedation. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|